WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you

Compression Therapy

Compression Therapy

Compression Therapy


Background: Compression therapy is considered the mainstay of venous leg ulcer (VLU) treatment [1] and, along with standard care, has the potential to heal 50%-75% of VLUs [1][2]. Despite existing references and guidelines, many patients with VLUs who are treated in primary care settings do not receive adequate compression therapy due to several factors, some related to patients (e.g., adherence) and some to clinicians (e.g, application skills, etc) [3].


  • Treatment and prevention of VLU
  • Varicose veins and edema
  • Post-thrombotic syndrome
  • Prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
  • Lymphedema  (recommend referral to lymphedema specialist)


  • Severe peripheral artery disease (PAD)
  • Acute DVT
  • Untreated cellulitis
  • Unstable cardiac failure

Product Types:

Evidence and Recommendations

  • 1B
    For VLU patients with no contraindications we recommend compression over no compression therapy to promote wound healing (Grade 1B).
  • 2B
    As for initial choice of compression therapy we suggest multi-component compression bandages over single-component compression bandages (Grade 2B), and multi-component bandages with an elastic layer (e.g, 4 layer bandages, or 4LB) over those composed mainly of inelastic layers (e.g, short stretch bandages) (Grade 2B).
  • 2B
    Two-layer gradient compression stockings that deliver 40 mmHg pressure at the ankle can be considered an effective alternative to multi-component compression systems (e.g., 4LB) (Grade 2B).
  • 2C
    Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy can be used associated with compression bandages when all other compression therapy methods have failed or on patients that do not tolerate multi-component compression systems or high compression gradient stockings (Grade 2C).
  • 2C
    To decrease risk of ulcer recurrence in patients with a healed VLU we suggest compression therapy with gradient compression stockings at the highest pressure patients can tolerate (Grade 2C).

Practice Tips

  • When considering compression devices, multicomponent systems with an elastic layer (e.g. 4LB), short stretch bandages and other types of compression bandages/wraps can be effective choices depending on factors such as patient comorbidities, tolerance to compression, characteristics of the ulcer, availability of resources, clinicians’ experience and familiarity with the compression method, and support from caregivers. For decision support on choices for effective compression therapy, see "How to Select Adequate Compression Therapy Pressure Levels and Products". For information on major brands of compression devices,  see "Compression Brands Quick Reference".

Coding and Coverage

  • Compression bandages, wraps and certain gradient compression stockings are covered by Medicare part B as long as used on patients with active VLU.
  • IPC for treatment of VLU may also be covered at least partially, if applied or supervised by a home visiting nurse or if utilized in a hospital or nursing home setting.



This topic provides a high-level overview on the use of compression therapy in the treatment of VLU (not for lymphedema). VLU is discussed in detail elsewhere (see "Venous Ulcers").  For more details on compression subtypes please see “Compression Bandages”, “Tubular Dressings (Bandages)”, "Gradient Compression Stockings" and “Dynamic or Intermittent Compression”. For decision support on choices for effective compression therapy see "How to Select Adequate Compression Therapy Pressure Levels and Products". For information on major brands of compression devices,  see "Compression Brands Quick Reference".


  • Compression therapy is considered the mainstay of VLU treatment [1] and, along with standard care, has the potential to heal 50%-75% of VLUs [1][2].
  • Despite existing references and guidelines, many patients with VLU who are treated in primary care settings do not receive compression therapy. In Europe records indicate that only 10-53% of patients with VLU receive adequate compression therapy [3]. In contrast, there is evidence that at European specialist centers, up to 88% of patients with VLU may receive compression therapy [4].
  • A 2010 study by the U.S. Wound Registry showed that patients with venous ulcers were provided adequate compression in fewer than 17% of visits, even at hospital based outpatient wound centers. [5]
  • Some of the reasons why compression therapy is underutilized are: lack of knowledge or confidence by clinicians, unclear referral pathways because of the variety of specialties that may be involved, local unavailability of compression bandages or hosiery and unwillingness of patients to wear compression therapy [3].

How the intervention works

  • Most VLU are associated with chronic venous insufficiency, however the etiology of VLU is not yet fully understood [1] [6]. Chronic venous insufficiency has been shown to be associated with venous hypertension [7], which most often results from thrombosis and/or valve disease affecting the superficial, perforator or deep veins [2]. In individuals with healthy venous valves, calf muscle contraction during ambulation (muscle pump) reduces the intravenous pressure at the ankle during, however in venous dysfunction pressure remains high resulting in ambulatory venous hypertension (Video 1, Figure 1[8] [9].  Venous hypertension results in inflammatory alterations with microcirculatory changes that can culminate in edema, venous stasis and VLU [10].

Video 1. Muscle pump

Figure 1 – Changes in pressure (measured at the ankle) in venous system of individuals with healthy and dysfunctional venous valves during lying, rising, standing and exercise

  • External compression has been used in an attempt to reverse venous hypertension and aid venous return [7]. Venous stasis and edema can be reduced by effectively applying external local compression which facilitates reabsorption of fluid from the interstitium into the lymphatics (Figure 2[8].  This phenomenon has been described by the Starling equation (Figure 3[8] [11].

Figure 2. The mechanism of action on compression

Figure 3. Starling equation

  • Working pressure and resting pressure:  to understand how compression therapy works, it is necessary to understand the difference between working and resting pressure [12].
    • Resting pressure is the result of compression of the extremity at rest. It corresponds to the force exerted by the bandage when the muscles are relaxed.
    • Working pressure is the pressure generated through the interaction of muscle contraction and the compression bandage when walking; it results from the resistance the bandage exerts to counteract muscle movement. The less the bandage yields in this process, the higher the working pressure and the stiffer/inelastic the bandage is.
    • Both kinds of pressure depend on several factors. Given that the working pressure is generated by active muscle contraction, it is always higher than the resting pressure. 
  • Factors that affect pressure delivered:
    • Compression device-related
      • Material used: inelastic components have high stiffness and so usually produce lower resting pressures but higher working pressures.
      • Number of components applied: stiffness increases with the number of components applied. Although the single components of multi-component bandages (e.g, 4 layer bandages) are elastic, the final product has properties of an inelastic bandage [13].
    • Patient-related: calf muscle and foot pump function, shape of the limb, ability to tolerate compression [3].
    • Clinician-related: pressure applied and application skills. Many clinicians are not familiar with compression therapy in general [14]. Compression application skills and available resources can affect sub-bandage pressure (i.e., pressure measured underneath the [2]. Even clinicians who are confident in their ability to apply compression can apply compression in a suboptimal way [15][16]. Some bandages offer visual guides that indicate proper application of the device. add how to apply
  • Other important facts about compression, explained by 2 physical laws: Pascal's law (Figure 4) and Laplace's Law (Figure 5[8] 
    • The same tension applied at the ankle will generate more pressure than if applied at the calf, due to the smaller radius at the ankle [17].
    • More layers of elastic compression bandaging incrementally increase compression and result in a less elastic bandage. This is in part due to friction between the layers [18]
    • The calculated value for sub-bandage pressure is the average pressure that will be exerted by a bandage on a limb of known circumference. Padding can be applied beneath compression bandages to reduce local variations in sub-bandage pressure [17].
    • Bandage width matters. A 10cm wide bandage applied with a total force of 'F' Newtons will produce only half the pressure a 5cm wide bandage applied with the same force, as the force is distributed over twice the area [17].

Figure 4. Pascal’s Law: external static pressure exerted on a confined fluid is distributed evenly


Figure 5. Laplace’s Law. Pressure applied by compression is proportional to the tension at the interface with skin and inversely proportional with limb radius

    Compression levels

    • Sub-bandage pressure is measured in mmHg at the ankle level. Classification of pressure exerted by compression devices varies across countries. Pressure measured in vivo in the medial gaiter area in the supine position for training purposes may be classified into the following categories (Table 1[19]

    Table 1. Pressure measured in vivo in the medial gaiter area in supine position for training purposes, as per the International Compression Club [19]

    Classification Pressure (mmHg)







    Very strong


    General Indications and Contraindications


    • Chronic venous insufficiency (including manifestations ranging from varicose veins to VLU)
      • Different pressure levels are indicated according to the severity of the diseased being treated [8]. The CEAP (Clinical - Etiology -Anatomy - Pathophysiology) classification system has been used to standardize documentation and description of the manifestations of chronic venous disease. The C (Clinical) category is divided as shown in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes indications and pressure levels commonly used in compression therapy for chronic venous disease. 
    • Lymphedema (recommend referral to lymphedema specialist)reference to specialized lymphedema management
    • Post-thrombotic syndrome
    • Prevention of deep venous thrombosis [8]

    Table 2CEAP (Clinical - Etiology - Anatomy - Pathophysiology) Classification

    • C0: No visible or palpable signs of venous disease
    • C1: Telangiectasies or reticular veins
    • C2: Varicose veins
    • C3: Edema
    • C4: Changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue divided into two subclasses:
      • C4a Pigmentation or eczema
      • C4b Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche
    • C5: Healed venous ulcer
    • C6: Active venous ulcer

    Table 3. Chronic venous insufficiency and compression pressure levels

    Condition Recommended pressure levels (sub-bandage, at the ankle)

    Active VLU (C6) with no contraindications to compression

    30-40 mmHg [20][21][22]

    Healed VLU, to reduce recurrence (C5)

    Highest pressure patient can tolerate, ranging from 18-35 mmHg. VLUs tend to recur less with higher pressure, however patient adherence is lower compared to lower pressure levels [1][23] 

    Varicose veins and edema (C2, C3)

    Skin and subcutaneous changes (C4)

    30-40 mmHg [24], however even low levels of compression (10-20 mmHg) can improve symptoms and edema [23]

    Simple varicose veins (C2)

    20-30 mmHg [21]


    • Severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD): all patients should be screened for arterial disease using Doppler measurement of the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) or Doppler continuous waveform analysis [25] by trained staff before receiving compression therapy [1]. Inadequate compression on a limb compromised by arterial disease can lead to ischemic sequelae and tissue necrosis [26]. ABI below 0.8 is often considered clinically significant PAD.
      • Patients with ABI between 0.5 and 0.8 may be eligible to receive modified (reduced) compression (20-30 mmHg at the ankle), pending vascular assessment and/or indication by a vascular specialist [1][27].
      • Patients with ABI below 0.5 or above 1.3, ankle pressure < 50 mmHg or toe pressure < 30 mmHg should not receive compression unless ordered by a physician and supervised by a vascular specialist [3][26][27]
    • Unstable congestive heart failure (CHF) with pulmonary edema: CHF and hemodynamic condition need to be under control prior to commencing compression, as heart can be overloaded once fluid is mobilized and leg edema starts to subside [3]. Signs and symptoms of unstable CHF and pulmonary edema include: significant peripheral edema, dyspnea, altered mental status, decreased diuresis, tachycardia, hypoperfusion, markedly elevated neck veins and rales heard with lung auscultation [28].
    • Acute DVT: if present, acute DVT needs to first be treated with anticoagulants for 7 days before compression therapy is started [29]
    • Untreated cellulitis: if present cellulitis needs to first be treated with systemic antibiotics for 24 hours and the patient should be afebrile before compression therapy is applied [3]. Patients can receive reduced compression if standard compression is difficult to tolerate. Dressing change frequency can be increased to monitor infection.

    Types of compression therapy devices

    • Adequate compression can be achieved by several methods, including use of a single component or layer (such as a compression stocking or one type of bandage) or using multiple components or layers (different types of bandages or stockings and bandages used together) [1][30]. Overall, evidence shows that multi-component systems are more effective than single-component systems. High compression is more effective than low compression, but among different types of high compression no clear differences have been observed [1].
    • All patients who are candidates for compression therapy should have their ABI, doppler waveform or toe brachial index (TBI) measured and recorded [3]. Assessment of arterial blood supply with these tests is a major determinant of the pressure level of compression to be applied. Other factors that influence choice of compression devices are: clinician’s preference and experience, wound status, exudate level, patient mobility, ability of the patient to self-apply compression, patient’s preferences, pain level, access to care, level of compression required, and availability of compression systems [3].  For decision support on choices for effective compression therapy, see "How to Select Adequate Compression Therapy Pressure Levels and Products".  For information on major brands of compression devices,  see "Compression Brands Quick Reference".
    • In general, compression devices for treatment of VLU can be classified as static or dynamic:
      • Static: Compression bandages and gradient compression stockings are forms of static compression and apply a constant pressure gradient from distal to proximal in the extremity [3][31]. This gradient of a 20–30% reduction in pressure from ankle to below knee is thought to aid venous return to the heart and occurs naturally when compression is applied to a limb of normal proportions due to the principles of Laplace’s Law [31]. Patients with altered limb shape, such as inverted champagne bottle shape, may require reshaping of the limb with padding prior to the application of compression in order to benefit from graduated compression. However, it is not clear how important this gradient is, especially for mobile patients [31]
      • Dynamic: Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is an example of dynamic compression. The sequential inflation and deflation of the chambers creates intermittent pressure peaks, mimicking the effect of the calf muscle pump and offering a number of benefits. It may be useful for patients with reduced mobility or wasting of the calf muscle [31].
    • Static or dynamic compression devices can be elastic, inelastic or a combination of both:
      • Elastic: elastic systems (also known as “long stretch”) contain elastomeric fibers and are capable of stretching and returning almost to their original size. They can sustain pressure for up to a week due to their ability to accommodate changes in limb shape and movement [9][31]. Elastic compression provides compression when patients are either walking or resting, which may not be desirable in patients with PAD [2].
      • Inelastic: inelastic systems contain no or few elastomeric fibers. They include “non-stretch” materials, such as zinc paste bandages, and “short-stretch” materials, which have a minimal extensibility (SSB) [31]. Inelastic systems can maintain levels of 30-60 mmHg in the first 24 hours after application, but this level decreases with movement of fluid and edema reduction. Most multi-component systems (two and four-components) function as an inelastic system even if they contain mainly elastic components [9]. Inelastic systems will produce higher pressures during standing and lower pressures when lying down than elastic systems [2] [9] making it more desirable in patients with mild arterial insufficiency [2].
      • Combination: compression system composed of both elastic and inelastic materials. Multi-component layers (e.g. Profore) behave as an inelastic or high stiffness system [13].
    • High or low stiffness:
      • Single or double-layer bandages are characterized by use of the terms ‘‘elastic and inelastic". Final behavior of kits or systems (e.g., multi-component systems) is characterized as ‘‘high or low stiffness’’ [19] Stiffness may be characterized by the increase of interface pressure measured in the gaiter area when standing up from the supine position [19].
      • High stiffness: Inelastic behavior. A pressure increase of > 10 mmHg measured in the gaiter area when standing up from supine position is characteristic of a stiff bandage system [19].
      • Low stiffness: Elastic/long stretch behavior. A pressure increase of < 10 mmHg measured in the gaiter area when standing up from supine position.

     Table 4. Types of compression devices, their stiffness and indications. (*) Stiffness listed as classified by Dissemond et al [12] 

    Types of devices with examples / stiffness (*)
    Beneficial to


    Compression bandages


    Low stiffness

    Elastic bandages are beneficial to individuals who do not ambulate or who have reduced mobility [29][32]

    Not desirable for patients with PAD


    High or  very high stiffness

    Inelastic bandages are useful when frequent dressing changes are needed due to weeping or when there is pressure damage from elastic bandages [29][31], and for patients with mild/moderate PAD [2]. Not indicated for patients with reduced mobility as it requires functional muscle pump to be effective [32].

    Inelastic bandages may be more adequate for patients with mild PAD [2]. Inelastic systems can maintain 30-60 mmHg in the first 24 hrs, but decreases with movement and edema reduction [9][31].


    (Profore, Profore Lite)

    High stiffness

    Clinical guidelines suggest multi-component compression systems with an elastic component (4LB) as the first choice of initial therapy for most patients with VLU with no contraindications [1][33]. Even with elastic component, a 4LB behaves as a high stiffness, inelastic system.

    4LB has been shown to be more cost-effective than multi-component compression systems without an elastic component in the U.K. [34][35]In practice, patient adherence to 4LB may be lower than to 2LB. Most multi-component compression systems are designed to deliver 40 mmHg at the ankle, decreasing to around 17 mmHg at the calf. 

    Tubular Dressing

    Elastic (Tubigrip)

    Inelastic (Juzo Cotton Stockinette)

    Link Juzo Cotton Stockinette

    Low or       high stiffness

    Patients with VLU who cannot tolerate high pressure levels or patients with PAD and ABI between 0.5 and 0.8

    Patients with VLU who require frequent daily dressing changes [36]

    Tubular dressings can provide either uniform or graduated compression.[1] They can be used as a single layer or more layers can be added, offering incremental pressure. 

    Gradient Compression Stockings



    Moderate stiffness

    Patients with CEAP C0-6 (different levels of compression needed)

    Prevention of new or recurrent VLU, healing of VLU

    Can be used as a first-line treatment for patients with small, uncomplicated ulcers who wish to self-care and who find bandages too hot or bulky [31] and patients without morbid obesity, lipodermatoesclerosis or severe edema [37]

    Custom fitt stockings may provide adequate compression to patients, however they are difficult to don and may lead to low adherence to therapy [38]

    Two-layer compression stockings (HH) that deliver 40 mmHg are as effective in healing VLU as 4LB and they appear to have additional benefit of reducing recurrence rates and being more cost-effective [37]

    Gradient Compression Wrap

    Inelastic (ReadyWrap, Circaid Juxtacures)

    High stiffness

    Patients who are unable to wear 35 to 45 mmHg gradient compression stockings because of weakness or arthritis or those who are unable to tolerate inelastic non-stretch compression bandage (e.g. Unna boot) [39]

    Inelastic compression provided by Velcro bands, can be adjusted as limb swelling decreases. Provides higher working and lower resting compression levels with low-stretch materials. A lower resting compression level can make it more tolerable to patients


    Intermittent Pneumatic Compression




    Patients with VLU who cannot wear or tolerate any of the other compression methods due to severe PAD, excessive pain, pressure damage [29], severe difficulty in donning compression stockings or have failed to respond to prolonged compression therapy alone [26]

    Patients with VLU with reduced mobility or wasting of the calf muscle [31]

    Whereas it is advantageous to use IPC compared with no compression therapy, currently there is limited evidence to suggest that the addition of IPC to compression therapy offers benefit [26] [40]

    Pressure levels are generally set to 50 mmHg but are never greater than diastolic pressure [32]

    Evidence and Recommendations

    Please see “Venous ulcers” section on 'Compression' for rationales and summary of evidence supporting the recommendations below. 

    • 1B
      For VLU patients with no contraindications we recommend compression over no compression therapy to promote wound healing (Grade 1B).
    • 2B
      As for initial choice of compression therapy, we suggest multi-component compression bandages over single-component compression bandages (Grade 2B).
    • 2B
      Two-layer gradient compression stockings (HH) that deliver 40 mmHg pressure at the ankle can be considered an effective alternative to multi-component compression systems (4LB) (Grade 2B).
    • 2C
      Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy can be used when all other compression therapy methods have failed or on patients that do not tolerate multi-component compression systems or high compression gradient stockings (Grade 2C).
    • 2C
      To decrease risk of ulcer recurrence in patients with a healed VLU, we suggest compression therapy with gradient compression stockings at the highest pressure patients can tolerate (Grade 2C).

    Practice Tips

    Choosing an ideal compression device
    • With the goal of achieving optimal sub-bandage pressure and gradient compression, clinicians should choose the type of compression device according to availability of resources, clinicians’ experience and familiarity with the compression method, characteristics of the ulcer, patient preference and support from caregivers. For decision support on choices for effective compression therapy see "How to Select Compression Therapy". For information on major brands of compression devices see "Compression Brands Quick Reference".
    Compression for VLU patients with CHF and PAD
    • For patients with CHF or history of CHF: if patient is stable, modified compression should be applied as long as patient is being treated and under control. If needed, diuretics can be increased upon application of compression for the first time and patient should be reassessed within 24-48 hours.
    • For patients with PAD and ABI between 0.5 and 0.8, use reduced level of compression (20-30 mmHg at the ankle) and closely monitor for complications. If resources are available and if uncertain about whether compression can be applied, clinicians can measure toe pressure with the patient lying in dorsal decubitus before and immediately after application of modified compression (e.g., SSB like Coban™ 2 Lite). Clinicians have reported increased toe pressure after SSB application.
    Get a head start on reducing edema
    • If a patient with VLU has significant edema and no CHF, and resources and time are available, a quick course of high pressure compression (e.g., with Ace wrap) can be applied to the patient’s leg for 10-20 minutes in the clinic before applying the dressings and compression bandages/stockings/wrap that the patient will go home with. Practitioners have seen patients lose 1-2 cm in leg diameter with the addition of this step.

    Risks and Complications

    Most complications due to compression therapy are avoidable if appropriate measures to mitigate risks are taken. If complications arise, it is important that they be addressed promptly. Below are some of the complications and a few practical suggestions to manage them [31]:

    • Pain: compression, when applied appropriately should reduce pain. However, effective compression may cause initial discomfort and anxiety. Suggestions based on expert opinion include:
      • Rule out any other causes of pain, such as PAD-related pain. Teach patient to recognize signs of PAD (e.g., changes in limb color/perfusion)
      • Ensure local wound care is done properly (see “Venous Ulcer” section on ‘Local Wound Care’)
      • If pain is related to compression: offer analgesics during the initial phase (1-2 weeks) until discomfort subsides or stage compression (start with a lower pressure level)
      • If pain remains uncontrolled, perform full reassessment (see “Venous Ulcer” section on ‘Plan Reassessment’)
    • Pressure Damage: signs of pressure damage resulting from compression therapy are erythema, blistering, altered/uneven limb shape. Among the risk factors are: patients with impaired peripheral perfusion, thin or altered limb shape, foot deformities, reduced sensation/pain sensation, long-term systemic steroid use and presence of a chronic disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) associated with reduced mobility, loss of calf muscle and foot/ankle deformity. Suggestions based on expert opinion include:
      • Avoid strong, sustained compression. Consider using inelastic compression or IPC associated with hosiery
      • Apply extra padding over bony prominences
      • Ensure overlap is even mainly at the dorsum of the foot, ankle and calf
    • Loss of calf muscle: may be seen in patients receiving long-term compression, most likely due to reduced patient activity and underlying comorbidities (as opposed to compression itself). Suggestions based on expert opinion include:
      • Ensure compression allows patient to flex knee and ankle at or near 90 degrees
      • Ensure shoes do not restrict patient’s ankle range of motion (flat, comfortable shoes are preferred)
      • Encourage calf muscle exercise
    • Skin problems: can arise due to excessive exudate or allergic reactions. Suggestions based on expert opinion include:
      • Fungal infection: excessive exudate can lead to fungal infection. Fungal infection needs to be treated to resolution before reapplication of occlusive dressings and compression. Prevent fungal infections by adequately managing exudate (see local wound care) and increasing frequency of dressing and compression system change until exudate is controlled.
      • Contact dermatitis: susceptible patients may develop contact dermatitis from one of the components of the compression system (e.g., latex, zinc, wool). Remove irritant or use a cotton stockinette liner or paste bandage against the skin to avoid irritation from wool padding.

    Patient Adherence

    • Many patients cannot tolerate, or do not adhere to, compression bandaging therapy [41]. It is estimated that 60-70% of patients do not appropriately adhere to compression therapy [42] [43]. Patients might find it difficult to tolerate compression due to several reasons, such as bandage bulk, lifestyle, climate or cultural factors [31]. Patients with obesity, frailty or arthritis will struggle to apply elastic compression stockings. Also, patients’ beliefs that compression is unnecessary and uncomfortable, or conversely that is worthwhile and prevents recurrence, affects adherence or non-adherence [44]. Thus, adherence can be improved by educating patients on the importance of compression therapy [45], and also by properly selecting the best compression alternative for each patient.
    • Below are some practical suggestions based on expert opinion to aid in patient adherence [3]:
      • Determine reasons for non-concordance and address any modifiable reason
      • Consider implementing lower level of compression and gradually increasing to a level that is tolerable for the patient
      • Consider the use of compression hosiery, tubular compression or IPC associated with hosiery
      • Limit bulk around the ankle/foot
      • Bandage protector to enable bathing/showering

    Transitioning to Stockings 

    Once VLUs are healed, to decrease risk of ulcer recurrence clinical guidelines recommend compression therapy with gradient compression stockings at the highest pressure patients can tolerate [46][47]

    • For simple VLU, when adherence is not an issue and patient is able to don gradient compression stockings: as ulcer is decreasing in size and complete healing is likely in about 2 weeks, gradient compression stockings can be prescribed and ordered (covered by Medicare if ulcer is active, not healed). After ulcer is healed, compression bandages may continue to be applied for 1-2 weeks to avoid damaging fragile newly healed area. 
    • For complex VLU, mixed etiology leg ulcers or when adherence is an issue: consult edema management specialist (e.g., physical therapist) early on (e.g., after initial evaluation), as patient education and choice of long-term compression according to patient preference and life-style may take several weeks.  
    • See indications, contraindications and how to use gradient compression stockings in " Compression: Gradient Compression Stockings".


    • VLU are a chronic, long-term problem with recurrence rates as high as 70%. Therefore, long-term maintenance must be addressed even for healed ulcers [47]. See “Venous Ulcers” section on ‘Patient Education’ for details on patient education for VLU healing, prevention of new VLU and prevention of recurrence.

    Compression therapy patient education materials (coming soon):

    Related Patient Education materials (coming soon):

    • Basic Principles of Wound Care (handout)
    • Chronic Ulcers (handout)
    • Debridement (handout)
    • Nutrition (handout)
    • Showering Instructions (handout)
    • Smoking Cessation (handout)
    • Ulcer Infection (handout)


    This section provides an overview of how the different compression modalities are coded and covered by Medicare in the United States. For detailed coding and coverage information for each compression subtype, please see section on “Coding, Coverage, Reimbursement” in the topics Compression Bandages”, “Tubular Dressings (Bandages)”, "Gradient Compression Stockings" and “Dynamic or Intermittent Compression”. 

    • Overall, compression bandages, wraps and certain gradient compression stockings are covered by Medicare Part B under the Surgical Dressing Benefit as long as used on patients with active VLU.  IPC also may be covered at least partially, if applied or supervised by a home visiting nurse or if utilized in a hospital or nursing home setting.
    • If a provider applies compression bandages or wraps as part of a professional service that is billed to Medicare, these supplies are considered incident to the professional services of the healthcare practitioner and are not separately payable. Claims for the professional service, which includes the supplies, must be submitted to the local carrier or intermediary. If compression bandages or wraps are sent home with the beneficiary, claims for these dressings may be submitted as durable medical equipment (DME). In this situation, use the place of service corresponding to the beneficiary's residence; Place of Service Office (POS=11) must not be used.
    • Medicare coverage of compression devices is managed by Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors (DME MAC). As it relates to compression therapy devices, DME MAC Jurisdictions (A,B,C and D) follow the same coverage determination and policy:
    • LCD and Policy Article guidance is summarized in table 5 below:

    Table 5. Medicare Coverage Guidelines for Compression Therapy Devices (refers to DME Supplies only, not procedural codes)

    Type of compression device

    HCPCS II code

    Frequency of replacement

    Coverage requirements

    Not covered for


    Padding bandages, non-elastic


    up to 1/week*

    be part of multicomponent system to treat VLU **

    strains, sprains, edema, or situations other than as a dressing for a wound

    Conforming bandages, non-elastic


    same as underlying dressing

    hold dressings covering any wound or be part of multicomponent system to treat VLU **

    Light compression bandages, elastic (i.e., ACE type)


    up to 1/week*

    hold dressings covering any wound

    Moderate compression bandages, elastic


    up to 1/week*

    be part of multicomponent system to treat VLU**

    High compression bandages, elastic


    up to 1/week*

    be part of multicomponent system to treat VLU**

    Self-adherent bandages, elastic


    up to 1/week*

    hold dressings covering any wound or be part of multicomponent system to treat VLU**

    Gradient Compression Wrap

    Gradient Compression Stockings 

    Gradient compression wrap, non-elastic


    1 per 6 months/leg

    be used to treat VLU

    venous insufficiency without VLU, prevention of new VLU, prevention of recurrence of VLU that have healed, treatment of lymphedema in the absence of VLU

    Gradient compression stockings 30-40, 40-50 mmHg

    A6531, A6532

    1 per 6 months/leg

    be used to treat VLU

    Gradient compression stockings other than above

    A6530, A6533-A6544



    not covered for any indication


    Surgical stockings



    not covered for any indication

    Non-elastic binder



    * unless part of a multicomponent system

    ** When multi-layer compression bandage systems are used for the treatment of a VLU, each component is billed using a specific HCPCS II code for the DME component. 


    Below are measures that are directly related to compression therapy for VLU. For other measures related to VLU see “Venous Ulcers” section ‘CMS Quality Measures’. For a comprehensive list of wound care related measures see “Wound Care Quality Measures”.

    MIPS currently does not have VLU-specific measures. Listed below are VLU/compression therapy-specific measures issued by the qualified clinical data registry (QCDR) US Wound Registry.






    Measure Type

    US Wound Registry (USWR)

    Adequate Compression at Each Visit for Patients with VLUs

    Percentage of venous leg ulcer visits of patients aged 18 years and older that received adequate compression within the 12-month reporting period.



    Official reprint from WoundReference® woundreference.com ©2018 Wound Reference, Inc. All Rights Reserved
    Use of WoundReference is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement. ​
    NOTE: This is a controlled document. This document is not a substitute for proper training, experience, and exercising of professional judgment. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents, neither the authors nor the Wound Reference, Inc. give any guarantee as to the accuracy of the information contained in them nor accept any liability, with respect to loss, damage, injury or expense arising from any such errors or omissions in the contents of the work.


    1. O'Meara, Susan; Cullum, Nicky; Nelson, E Andrea; Dumville, Jo C et al. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;volume 11():CD000265.
    2. Kirsner, Robert S et al. Compression of venous ulcers: standardizing standard care. JAMA dermatology. 2014;volume 150(7):736-737.
    3. Harding, Keith; Dowsett, Caroline; Fias, Lore; et, al et al. Simplifying venous leg ulcer management. Consensus recommendations. . 2017;.
    4. Probst S DClinPrac, RN, Seppänen S MNsc, RN, Gerber V, Hopkins A MSc, RGN, DN Cert, Rimdeika R MD, PhD, Gethin G PhD, PG Dip Wound Care, RCN, Dip Anatomy, Dip Applied Physiology, FFNMRCSI et al. EWMA Document: Home Care-Wound Care: Overview, Challenges and Perspectives. Journal of wound care. 2014;volume 23 Suppl 5a():S1-S41.
    5. . Quality Measures - US Wound Registry .;.
    6. Comerota, Anthony; Lurie, Fedor et al. Pathogenesis of venous ulcer. Seminars in vascular surgery. 2015;volume 28(1):6-14.
    7. Moffat, C et al. Compression therapy in practice . 2017;.
    8. Attaran, Robert R; Ochoa Chaar, Cassius I et al. Compression therapy for venous disease. Phlebology. 2017;volume 32(2):81-88.
    9. Wounds International, et al. Principles of compression in venous disease: a practitioner’s guide to treatment and prevention of venous leg ulcers. . 2017;.
    10. Chi, Yung-Wei; Raffetto, Joseph D et al. Venous leg ulceration pathophysiology and evidence based treatment. Vascular Medicine. 2015;volume 20(2):168-181.
    11. Lim, Chung Sim; Davies, Alun H et al. Graduated compression stockings. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2014;volume 186(10):E391-8.
    12. Dissemond, Joachim; Assenheimer, Bernd; Bültemann, Anke; Gerber, Veronika; Gretener, Silvia; Kohler-von Siebenthal, Elisabeth; Koller, Sonja; Kröger, Knut; Kurz, Peter; Läuchli, Severin; Mün... et al. Compression therapy in patients with venous leg ulcers. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesell.... 2016;volume 14(11):1072-1087.
    13. Partsch, H; Schuren, J; Mosti, G; Benigni, J P et al. The Static Stiffness Index: an important parameter to characterise compression therapy in vivo. Journal of Wound Care. 2016;volume 25 Suppl 9():S4-S10.
    14. Protz, Kerstin; Heyer, Kristina; Dörler, Martin; Stücker, Markus; Hampel-Kalthoff, Carsten; Augustin, Matthias et al. Compression therapy: scientific background and practical applications. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesell.... 2014;volume 12(9):794-801.
    15. Kirsner, Robert S; Margolis, David J et al. Stockings before bandages: an option for venous ulcers. The Lancet. 2014;volume 383(9920):850-851.
    16. Zarchi, Kian; Jemec, Gregor B E et al. Delivery of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. JAMA dermatology. 2014;volume 150(7):730-736.
    17. Thomas, S. et al. The use of the Laplace equation in the calculation of sub-bandage pressure Eur Wound Manage Assoc. 2017;volume 3(1):21-23.
    18. Chassagne, Fanette; Martin, Frédéric; Badel, Pierre; Convert, Reynald; Giraux, Pascal; Molimard, Jérôme et al. Experimental investigation of pressure applied on the lower leg by elastic compression bandage. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015;volume 43(12):2967-2977.
    19. Partsch, Hugo; Clark, Michael; Mosti, Giovanni; Steinlechner, Erik; Schuren, Jan; Abel, Martin; Benigni, Jean-Patrick; Coleridge-Smith, Philip; Cornu-Thénard, Andre; Flour, Mieke; Hutchinson... et al. Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects. Dermatologic Surgery. 2008;volume 34(5):600-609.
    20. Callam, M. J.; Harper, D. R.; Dale, J. J.; Brown, D.; Gibson, B.; Prescott, R. J.; Ruckley, C. V. et al. Lothian and Forth Valley Leg Ulcer Healing Trial, Part 1: Elastic versus Non-Elastic Bandaging in the Treatment of Chronic Leg Ulceration Phlebology. 1992;volume 7(4):136-141.
    21. Gloviczki, Peter; Comerota, Anthony J; Dalsing, Michael C; Eklof, Bo G; Gillespie, David L; Gloviczki, Monika L; Lohr, Joann M; McLafferty, Robert B; Meissner, Mark H; Murad, M Hassan; Padbe... et al. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011;volume 53(5 Suppl):2S-48S.
    22. Partsch H, Flour M, Smith PC, International Compression Club. et al. Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence. Under the auspices of the IUP. International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology. 2008;volume 27(3):193-219.
    23. Rabe E, Partsch H, Hafner J, Lattimer C, Mosti G, Neumann M, Urbanek T, Huebner M, Gaillard S, Carpentier P et al. Indications for medical compression stockings in venous and lymphatic disorders: An evidence-based consensus statement. Phlebology. 2018;volume 33(3):163-184.
    24. Motykie, G D; Caprini, J A; Arcelus, J I; Reyna, J J; Overom, E; Mokhtee, D et al. Evaluation of therapeutic compression stockings in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Dermatologic Surgery. 1999;volume 25(2):116-120.
    25. Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Nabavizadeh R, Valaei F, Coutts P, Mayer D et al. Audible handheld Doppler ultrasound determines reliable and inexpensive exclusion of significant peripheral arterial disease. Vascular. 2015;volume 23(6):622-9.
    26. O'Donnell, Thomas F; Passman, Marc A; Marston, William A; Ennis, William J; Dalsing, Michael; Kistner, Robert L; Lurie, Fedor; Henke, Peter K; Gloviczki, Monika L; Eklöf, Bo G; Stoughton, Ju... et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery ® and the American Venous Forum. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2014;volume 60(2 Suppl):3S-59S.
    27. Bonham, Phyllis A; Flemister, Bonny G; Droste, Linda R; Johnson, Jan J; Kelechi, Teresa; Ratliff, Catherine R; Varnado, Myra F et al. 2014 Guideline for Management of Wounds in Patients With Lower-Extremity Arterial Disease (LEAD): An Executive Summary. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurs.... 2016;volume 43(1):23-31.
    28. Joseph, Susan M; Cedars, Ari M; Ewald, Gregory A; Geltman, Edward M; Mann, Douglas L et al. Acute decompensated heart failure: contemporary medical management. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2009;volume 36(6):510-520.
    29. Livingston, M; Wolvos, T et al. Scottsdale Wound Management Guide . 2015;.
    30. Mauck, Karen F; Asi, Noor; Elraiyah, Tarig A; Undavalli, Chaitanya; Nabhan, Mohammed; Altayar, Osama; Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam; Prokop, Larry J; Murad, Mohammad Hassan et al. Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of compression modalities for the promotion of venous ulcer healing and reducing ulcer recurrence. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2014;volume 60(2 Suppl):71S-90S.e1.
    31. World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS), et al. Principles of best practice: Compression in venous leg ulcers. A consensus document. . 2017;.
    32. Joseph McCulloch PhD PT CWS FACCWS FAPTA, ; Luther C. Kloth MS PT CWS FACCWS FAPTA, et al. Wound Healing: Evidence-Based Management (Contemporary Perspectives in Rehabilitation) . 2010;.
    33. O'Donnell, Thomas F; Balk, Ethan M et al. The need for an Intersociety Consensus Guideline for venous ulcer. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011;volume 54(6 Suppl):83S-90S.
    34. Iglesias, C P; Nelson, E A; Cullum, N; Torgerson, D J; VenUS I collaborators et al. Economic analysis of VenUS I, a randomized trial of two bandages for treating venous leg ulcers. The British Journal of Surgery. 2004;volume 91(10):1300-1306.
    35. Ukat, A; Konig, M; Vanscheidt, W; Münter, K C et al. Short-stretch versus multilayer compression for venous leg ulcers: a comparison of healing rates. Journal of Wound Care. 2003;volume 12(4):139-143.
    36. Dabiri, Ganary; Hammerman, Scott; Carson, Polly; Falanga, Vincent et al. Low-grade elastic compression regimen for venous leg ulcers--an effective compromise for patients requiring daily dressing changes. International wound journal. 2015;volume 12(6):655-661.
    37. Ashby, Rebecca L; Gabe, Rhian; Ali, Shehzad; Adderley, Una; Bland, J Martin; Cullum, Nicky A; Dumville, Jo C; Iglesias, Cynthia P; Kang'ombe, Arthur R; Soares, Marta O; Stubbs, Nikki C; Torg... et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014;volume 383(9920):871-879.
    38. Sippel, K; Seifert, B; Hafner, J et al. Donning devices (foot slips and frames) enable elderly people with severe chronic venous insufficiency to put on compression stockings. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular.... 2015;volume 49(2):221-229.
    39. Blecken, Sonja R; Villavicencio, Juan Leonel; Kao, Tzu C et al. Comparison of elastic versus nonelastic compression in bilateral venous ulcers: a randomized trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2005;volume 42(6):1150-1155.
    40. Nelson, E Andrea; Hillman, Alex; Thomas, Kate et al. Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;.
    41. Bale, Sue; Harding, Keith G et al. Managing patients unable to tolerate therapeutic compression. British Journal of Nursing. 2003;volume 12(19 Suppl):S4-13.
    42. Raju, Seshadri; Hollis, Kathryn; Neglen, Peter et al. Use of compression stockings in chronic venous disease: patient compliance and efficacy. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2007;volume 21(6):790-795.
    43. Raju, Seshadri; Lurie, Fedor; O'Donnell, Thomas F et al. Compression use in the era of endovenous interventions and wound care centers. Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymph.... 2016;volume 4(3):346-354.
    44. Van Hecke, Ann; Grypdonck, Maria; Defloor, Tom et al. A review of why patients with leg ulcers do not adhere to treatment. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;volume 18(3):337-349.
    45. Jull, A B; Mitchell, N; Arroll, J; Jones, M; Waters, J; Latta, A; Walker, N; Arroll, B et al. Factors influencing concordance with compression stockings after venous leg ulcer healing. Journal of Wound Care. 2004;volume 13(3):90-92.
    46. Couch KS, Corbett L, Gould L, Girolami S, Bolton L et al. The International Consolidated Venous Ulcer Guideline Update (2015): Process Improvement, Evidence Analysis, and Future Goals. Ostomy/wound management. 2017;volume 63(5):42-46.
    47. Marston, William; Tang, Jennifer; Kirsner, Robert S; Ennis, William et al. Wound Healing Society 2015 update on guidelines for venous ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2016;volume 24(1):136-144.
    48. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), et al. Local Coverage Determination for Surgical Dressings (L33831) . 2017;.
    49. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, et al. Local Coverage Article for Surgical Dressings - Policy Article (A54563) . 2015;.
    Topic 23 Version 1.0