WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you
LeBlanc K, Baranoski S, Holloway S, Langemo D, Regan M, et al.
International wound journal. Date of publication 2014 Aug 1;volume 11(4):424-30.
1. Int Wound J. 2014 Aug;11(4):424-30. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12203. Epub 2014 Jan 21. A descriptive cross-sectional international study to explore current practices in the assessment, prevention and treatment of skin tears. LeBlanc K(1), Baranoski S, Holloway S, Langemo D, Regan M. Author information: (1)KDS Professional Consulting, Ottawa, ON, Canada. This study presents the results of a descriptive, cross-sectional, online international survey in order to explore current practices in the assessment, prediction, prevention and treatment of skin tears (STs). A total of 1127 health care providers (HCP) from 16 countries completed the survey. The majority of the respondents (69·6%, n = 695) reported problems with the current methods for the assessment and documentation of STs with an overwhelming majority (89·5%, n = 891) favouring the development of a simplified method of assessment. Respondents ranked equipment injury during patient transfer and falls as the main causes of STs. The majority of the samples indicated that they used non-adhesive dressings (35·89%, n = 322) to treat a ST, with the use of protective clothing being the most common method of prevention. The results of this study led to the establishment of a consensus document, classification system and a tool kit for use by practitioners. The authors believe that this survey was an important first step in raising the global awareness of STs and to stimulate discussion and research of these complex acute wounds. © 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12203 PMID: 24443829 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Appears in following Topics:
Skin Tears - Introduction and Assessment
t
-->