WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you
Shih YC, Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, Perkins GH, Elting LS, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Date of publication 2009 Apr 20;volume 27(12):2007-14.
1. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):2007-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3517. Epub 2009 Mar 16. Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. Shih YC(1), Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, Perkins GH, Elting LS. Author information: (1)Section of Health Services Research, Department of Biostatistics, Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA. yashih@mdanderson.org PURPOSE: This study estimated the economic burden of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) among working-age women, the incidence of lymphedema, and associated risk factors. METHODS: We used claims data to study an incident cohort of breast cancer patients for the 2 years after the initiation of cancer treatment. A logistic regression model was used to ascertain factors associated with lymphedema. We compared the medical costs and rate of infections likely associated with lymphedema between a woman with BCRL and a matched control. We performed nonparametric bootstrapping to compare the unadjusted cost differences and estimated the adjusted cost differences in regression analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 10% of the 1,877 patients had claims indicating treatment of lymphedema. Predictors included treatment with full axillary node dissection (odds ratio [OR] = 6.3, P < .001) and chemotherapy (OR = 1.6, P = .01). A geographic variation was observed; women who resided in the West were more likely to have lymphedema claims than those in the Northeast (OR = 2.05, P = .01). The matched cohort analysis demonstrated that the BCRL group had significantly higher medical costs ($14,877 to $23,167) and was twice as likely to have lymphangitis or cellulitis (OR = 2.02, P = .009). Outpatient care, especially mental health services, diagnostic imaging, and visits with moderate or high complexity, accounted for the majority of the difference. CONCLUSION: Although the use of claims data may underestimate the true incidence of lymphedema, women with BCRL had a greater risk of infections and incurred higher medical costs. The substantial costs documented here suggest that further efforts should be made to elucidate reduction and prevention strategies for BCRL. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3517 PMID: 19289624 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Appears in following Topics:
Lymphedema - Introduction and Assessment
t
-->