WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you
Cho I, Lee HM, Choi SW, Kong SK, Lee IW, Goh EK, Oh SJ, et al.
Audiology & neuro-otology. Date of publication 2018 Jan 1;volume 23(4):199-207.
1. Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(4):199-207. doi: 10.1159/000493558. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Comparison of Two Different Treatment Protocols Using Systemic and Intratympanic Steroids with and without Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Severe to Profound Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cho I(1), Lee HM(2), Choi SW(1), Kong SK(1), Lee IW(2), Goh EK(1), Oh SJ(3). Author information: (1)Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. (2)Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Research Institute, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea. (3)Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Koreaentmania@pusan.ac.kr. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of simultaneous steroid and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), which has a poor prognosis. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with severe to profound ISSNHL (≥70 dB HL) were randomly divided into two groups in a prospective controlled trial: an oral steroid + intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) group (control group) and an oral steroid + ITSI + HBOT group (study group). Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) results and word discrimination scores (WDS) were compared between the two groups before treatment and 10 days and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Hearing improvement was assessed using the modified American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria. Analyses were by both intention to treat and per protocol. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients completed the 3-month follow-up, and 2 patients in the study group were excluded due to follow-up loss in the per-protocol analysis. In the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the study group showed significantly better hearing levels than did the control group at 500 Hz (p < 0.05) 1 month after treatment and at 1 kHz (p < 0.05) 3 months after treatment. However, the average PTA values and PTA at 2, 4, and 8 kHz showed no significant difference. WDS improvement was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group 3 months after treatment by both per-protocol (66.4 ± 13.3 and 56.7 ± 19.1%, respectively; p = 0.029) and intention-to-treat analyses (65.9 ± 14.1 and 56.7 ± 19.1%, respectively; p = 0.035). The sum of complete and partial hearing recovery for the study group was significantly higher than that for the control group by per-protocol analysis (60.7 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.037) and intention-to-treat analysis (60.0 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the addition of HBOT to steroid combination therapy does not improve the average PTA values in severe to profound ISSNHL; however, it was associated with a better outcome at 500 Hz 1 month after treatment and, at 1 kHz, WDS 3 months after treatment. The sum of complete and partial hearing recovery was significantly higher for the study group than for the control group. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel. DOI: 10.1159/000493558 PMID: 30380530
Appears in following Topics:
Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
t
-->